[Salon] The Judge Standing up to Trump's Portland Invasion






Tuesday, October 7, 2025

The Judge Standing up to Trump's Portland Invasion

In Portland, our intrepid legal affairs editor braves ICE and kombucha to report on the Justice Department’s Orwellian arguments and how a Trump-nominated jurist is holding the line for democracy.


by Garrett Epps


“Freedom,” wrote George Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-Four, “is the freedom to say two plus two make four. Once that is granted, all else follows.”


But what if the test is whether a president can add two and two and get in the neighborhood of four? What if the president says 2+2=10,000?


Is that close enough for government work?


Federal Judge Karin J. Immergut of the District of Oregon, 64, confronted this question—which is of a quality strange to laypeople with common sense but, alas, all-too-familiar to lawyers—in a hearing Friday in the case of Oregon v. Trump, a challenge by the state of Oregon and the city of Portland to Trump’s commandeering of 200 members of the Oregon National Guard for the purpose of subduing Portland. The case calls to mind a different Orwell quote: “To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle.”


What is in front of our noses is that Portland, Oregon, is an average American city, or I think, a city where, for many people, the living is better than in an “average city.” Despite some classic urban problems—persistent homelessness, the high cost of housing, a falling crime rate that ranks 56th in the nation but makes some neighborhoods unsafe, traffic, and political divisions that sometimes become street brawls—the only profound difference between Portland and where you live is that the chief executive of the United States has declared war on this city and ordered federal forces to invade it. Trump has done that under a statute that requires two plus two to equal four; anyone with eyes can see that he is proclaiming that zero plus zero equals Defcon One.


Many Americans, including the eager Fox News watcher in the White House, are convinced that Portland is a hellscape of arson and violence.


It’s not. Over the weekend, Portland’s 50-year-old Saturday Market unfolded as usual on the banks of the Willamette River; 9,000 people ran the Portland Marathon; the Portland Thorns soccer team beat the Bay Football Club 2-1 in front of a nearly 17,000 fans, and Powell’s City of Books, perhaps the world’s greatest bookstore, was jammed full of readers scanning bestsellers while sipping lattes and kombucha. True, Treebeerd’s Taproom did not open until 2 p.m. on Friday, but on investigation, it was determined that Treebeerd’s Taproom never opens until 2 p.m. Also on Saturday night, several hundred protesters marched to the city’s ICE headquarters to decry the treatment of immigrants. ICE personnel handled the protest just fine with tear gas, and even managed to send two 84-year-old demonstrators to the hospital after beating them to the ground.


And after being served with a federal court order forbidding him from taking over Oregon National Guard troops and sending them in, Trump, as he often does, decided to go to court by sending in California Guard troops to do the same work.


Could President Trump really think Portland is Hell? Or to put it differently, could a reasonable Donald Trump, if such a thing can be imagined, really think it is?




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.